Hacking the Challenge of Authentic Assessment in PAI-BP Learning at SMK Negeri 1 Lubuk Sikaping
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v11i1.282Keywords:
Authentic Assesment, Learning Evaluation, PAI-BP, Vocational EducationAbstract
The implementation of authentic assessment in the learning process of Islamic Education and Character Building (PAI-BP) in vocational high schools remains a significant challenge, particularly in aligning assessment methods with the unique characteristics of vocational students. This study aims to explore the existing barriers and propose strategic solutions to overcome obstacles in authentic assessment practices at SMK Negeri 1 Lubuk Sikaping. The research focuses on how authentic assessment can more effectively measure students' competence in spiritual attitudes, social behavior, knowledge, and skills, as mandated by the Merdeka Curriculum. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the study collects data through in-depth interviews with PAI-BP teachers, classroom observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that time constraints, teacher readiness, limited understanding of assessment instruments, and insufficient integration of spiritual-moral competencies into practice-based tasks constitute major hindrances. Despite these challenges, several good practices emerge, including the use of reflective journals, project-based tasks, and peer assessments that help bridge the gap between theory and practice. The study concludes that consistent professional development, collaborative teacher forums, and simplified but comprehensive assessment rubrics are critical to fostering a culture of meaningful and sustainable authentic assessment. These findings contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of PAI-BP instruction in vocational education contexts.
References
A. Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Thomas, S., & Quoc Le, N. (2020). The Role of Rubrics in Learning and Implementation of Authentic Assessment: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 2020 InSITE Conference, (October), 237–276. chrome-extension://kdpelmjpfafjppnhbloffcjpeomlnpah/http://www.proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2020/InSITE2020p237-276Nkhoma6195.pdf
Achmad, G. H., Ratnasari, D., Amin, A., Yuliani, E., & Liandara, N. (2022). Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif?: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5685–5699. https://www.edukatif.org/edukatif/article/view/3280/pdf
Albina, M., Safi’i, A., Gunawan, M. A., Wibowo, M. T., Sitepu, N. A. S., & Ardiyanti, R. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Di Abad Ke 21. Warta Dharmawangsa, 16(4), 939–955. https://journal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/juwarta/article/view/2446/1788
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. In H. Salmon (Ed.), SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. (5th ed.). India. chrome-extension://kdpelmjpfafjppnhbloffcjpeomlnpah/https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
Ermiyanto, & Fadriati. (2023). Integrasi Nilai Akhlak Mulia dalam Budaya Minangkabau Pada Mata Pelajaran PAI BP. Ta Lim Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 15–24. doi: 10.59098/talim.v2i1.795
Gadink, M., & Sukenti, D. (2024). Pengaruh kecerdasan emosional terhadap penilaian autentik disekolah menengah atas. Jurnal EDUCATIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(1), 681–688.
Hasanah, N., Darwisa, D., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2023). Analisis Strategi Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Ranah Afektif Peserta Didik Di Sekolah Dasar. Academy of Education Journal, 14(2), 635–648. doi: 10.47200/aoej.v14i2.1828
Henderson, A., Karr-Kidwell, P.?;, & Henderson, P. (1998). Authentic assessment: An extensive literary review and recommendations for administrators.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Tahapan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Satuan Pendidikan. In Kemendibudristek. Retrieved from https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wpcontent/uploads/2022/07/TahapanImplementasi-Kurikulum-Merdeka.pdf
Kleinschmidt, G. (2023). Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie. DIPF | Leibniz-Institut Für Bildungsforschung Und Bildungsinformat, 43(1992), 1992–1995. chromeextension://kdpelmjpfafjppnhbloffcjpeomlnpah/https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/61191/Klinkhardt_2023_Proske_ua_Schule_Unterricht.pdf?sequence=1#page=172
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2nd ed., Vol. 1304). London: SAGE Publications. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1574013717300606
Nirwana, R., Hidayati, A. I., Assayyidah Ifcha, F., Azzahra, S. F., Sayyidah, A., & Jannah, R. (2024). Penilaian Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka: Mendukung Pembelajaran Adaptif Dan Berpusat Pada peserta didik Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (JMI), 02(2), 213. https://journal.unusida.ac.id/index.php/jmi/article/view/1320
Pebriyanti, M., Nauli Siagian, F., & Tabroni. (2024). Kesiapan Guru dalam Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum Merdeka Pembelajaran IPAS di Sekolah Dasar. IBTIDA’: Media Komunikasi Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 5(1), 1–10. https://journal.faibillfath.ac.id/index.php/ibtida/article/view/677
Putri, F., & Zakir, S. (2023). Mengukur Keberhasilan Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Telaah Evaluasi Formatif Dan Sumatif Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 2(4), 172–180. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v2i4.1783
Rifai, M., Utomo, D. H., Astina, I. K., & Suharto, Y. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik berbasis penilaian autentik. Jurnal Integrasi Dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(7), 753–759. https://journal3.um.ac.id/index.php/fis/article/view/3972
Sa?, R. (2014). The Course of Pre-Service Teachers’ Expectations in School Practices and the Factors Affecting Their Expectations. Creative Education, 05(05), 353–371. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=45209
Suhendra, A. (2021). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Dirasatul Ibtidaiyah, 1(1), 85–97. http://jurnal.uinsyahada.ac.id/index.php/IBTIDAIYAH/article/view/3724
Suleman, R., & Luneto, B. (2023). Implementasi Profil Pelajar Pancasila Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMK Negeri 1 Limboto. Pekerti: Journal Pendidikan Islam Dan Budi Pekerti, 5(1), 13–22. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/pekerti/article/view/3365
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. - practical assessment, research & evaluation. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 2(2), 1–3. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Blooms Taxonomy Revised - Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 1(1), 1–8. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Wilson%2C+L.+O.+%282016%29.+Blooms+Taxonomy+Revised+-+Understanding+the+New+Version+of+Bloom%E2%80%99s+Taxonomy.+A+Taxonomy+for+Learning%2C+Teaching%2C+and+Assessing%3A+A+Revision+of+Bloom%E2%80%99s+Taxonomy+of+Educational+Objectives%2C+1%281%29%2C+1%E2%80%938.&btnG=.
Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Cetakan Ke). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Maolani, R. A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Cetakan Ke). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Zubaedi. (2015). Desain Pendidikan Karakter: Konsepsi dan Aplikasinya dalam Lembaga Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Setyosari, P. (2022). Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wijiatun, Lusia & Indrajid, R. E. (2022). Merdeka Belajar. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan A. P., & Kementerian Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan T. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Danim, S. (2013). menjadi peneliti kualitatif (Cetakan Ke). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fuji Pratami, Lia Agustina Demanik, Rina Juliana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





















